Work · 001 The Agency

Diagnose first.
Build to last.

Three engagements. Three levels of the same operating model: positioning, strategic prioritization, execution systems. Each one a different constraint. Each one solved at the root.

Book a fit call →
01
Diagnosis
Find the constraint that's actually limiting growth — not the visible symptom.
02
Strategy
Build the operating infrastructure that connects daily activity to business outcomes.
03
Execution
Deploy with proof. The system keeps running. The client owns it permanently.
Phase 01 · Diagnosis
The growth constraint ran deeper than campaign performance — into positioning, offer architecture, and GTM alignment.
01
Executive Education · Strategic Repositioning · GTM Redesign

Executive Education Program

B2B · High-ticket

Strong brand equity and a high-caliber audience — but growth had plateaued. The constraint was structural: value wasn't translating into differentiated messaging, growth leaned heavily on legacy channels and brand reputation, and there was no system connecting positioning to acquisition to conversion to expansion. The opportunity was in the architecture — not the effort.

Full strategic repositioning: audience redefinition, messaging architecture, offer restructuring. Shifted all messaging toward outcomes, identity, and trajectory change — not features or curriculum. Redesigned the GTM motion: top-of-funnel, mid-funnel nurture, and enrollment conversations brought into alignment for the first time. Then co-led the launch of a zero-to-one Innovation Conference at Oxford University — new format, new pipeline, designed and executed from scratch. Executives don't buy curriculum. They buy identity elevation and trajectory change.

Revenue growth in year one following repositioning
0→1
Oxford Innovation Conference — built from scratch
ICP
Audience redefined before a single asset was rebuilt
Phase 02 · Strategy
In a portfolio environment, the constraint is never execution. It's focus.
02
Private Investment · Portfolio Strategy · Executive Advisory

Investment Portfolio

Multi-company · Fractional

Portfolio companies were pursuing too many growth initiatives simultaneously. Strong execution capacity across the board — but no shared framework for deciding what to prioritize, what to stop, and what would actually move enterprise value. Fragmented activity, weak alignment between positioning and revenue drivers, and limited visibility into where each company had its highest-leverage opportunities.

Ran strategic diagnosis across multiple portfolio companies simultaneously — assessing market positioning, ICP clarity, offer-market fit, and GTM motion effectiveness. Identified where companies were over-investing, under-leveraging, or misaligned internally. Built GTM strategy and prioritization frameworks that helped leadership teams decide what not to do, and sequence initiatives by impact. Translated complexity into clear strategic choices at the executive level — where to invest, what to fix first, what would actually move revenue.

Multi
Portfolio companies engaged simultaneously
GTM
Strategy defined and implemented across companies
Exec
C-suite level engagement, fractional model
Phase 03 · Execution
385+ qualified leads. $3M+ in closed revenue. System still running 18 months after the engagement closed.
03
Local Services · Paid Acquisition · Performance Systems

Regional Services Company

Results · System still active

High-ticket local services business (~$150K average project) in a seasonal, competitive market. Heavy reliance on referrals, inconsistent lead flow, and limited attribution visibility. No system connecting marketing activity to pipeline to closed revenue. Digital acquisition channels were under-leveraged, and there was no infrastructure to measure what was working or scale what wasn't.

Built end-to-end performance infrastructure: tracking across leads, source attribution, and project conversion — connecting marketing spend to actual closed revenue for the first time. Built and managed Google Ads campaigns targeting high-intent local search. Optimized for qualified leads, not volume. Restructured website and user journey to align with buyer intent and reduce friction. Identified a seasonal allocation insight — SEO as off-season asset investment, paid ads as peak-season demand capture — and built the strategy around it. Assets handed over permanently. System was producing results before the engagement closed.

385+
Qualified leads generated
$3M+
Closed revenue attributed to the system
18mo
System active and producing post-engagement
Worth considering

Three questions every founder asks before they hire. Can they handle my complexity? Have they done this at my level? Will the work last past the contract?

Ready to
execute?

These three engagements operate at three different levels of the same system — positioning, strategic architecture, execution with measurable results. If you're between $5M and $20M — B2B or B2C services — execution in place, traction inconsistent, that's the exact constraint this practice is built to solve. The GTM Audit is where we start.

Book a fit call →